🔗 Share this article

The nation's controversial policy to restrict social networking access for young people below 16 is sparking debate internationally. Officials, child protection groups, and families are observing intently to see if this approach will inspire imitation for other nations.

The European Movement

Across Europe, a increasing chorus of states are considering comparable bans.

• Denmark has stated a prohibition on social media for children under fifteen, with the prime minister arguing that phones and apps are "robbing our youngsters' youth". Legislation may be passed in the coming year.
• The Norwegian government is set to enforce a minimum age limit of 15, pointing to the need to shield the young from the "manipulative force of the AI".
• Ireland is introducing a digital wallet to verify the age and identity of social media users. The media minister have indicated that an Australia-style ban could be "one of the options under consideration".
• In The Spanish government, the president has called on parliament to pass a proposal raising the minimum age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has threatened a ban for under-15s, and a parliamentary commission has suggested a similar step, potentially involving an overnight "screen time restriction" for older teenagers.
• The administration in The Netherlands has recommended families to restrict their kids from social media before 15.

Across the European Union, the bloc's legislature has adopted a advisory resolution demanding a ban for minors except if guardian approval is given. Even though it warns of the "addictive" design of these platforms, the step does not create enforceable legislation.

"An effective age limit is a solid foundation," said the parliamentarian behind the measure.

Britain: A Cautious Stance

For the United Kingdom, the administration has kept open a possible ban, emphasizing that "no option is being dismissed" but maintaining any action must be "supported by strong evidence".

Previously, support built behind a legislative effort to enact controls on social media use by under-16s, but it was eventually watered down. Instead, the government pledged to investigate the matter.

Charities have raised warnings. A prominent charity founded by the loved ones of a young person who was lost after viewing disturbing online content suggests that a blanket age ban could fail to make platforms safer and could result in a "sudden drop-off" of exposure when teens reach the legal age.

"Australia's ban is a answer to the failure of the Silicon Valley to build products and services that are safe and age appropriate for children," commented a prominent child protection advocate.

The United States: A Fragmented Approach

Stateside, regulation is largely happening at the local level amid federal stalemate.

• Utah mandates parental consent for under-18s to use social media and limits late-night use.
• The state of Florida has passed a measure barring under-14s from creating accounts on social media, though it faces court battles.
• Virginia has approved a law limiting under-16s to 60 minutes of social media access per day, with extra access dependent on adult consent.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have likewise introduced laws demanding adult authorization for teenagers to open social media profiles.

Despite widespread concern and proposals from various individuals to mimic Australia's example, a US-wide ban is presently seen as unlikely.

International Views

Apart from Europe and the US, additional countries are similarly taking action.

• The Malaysian government plans to restrict social media for teenagers effective next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has lifted the access age for the platform Instagram to 16.

However, world agencies strike a more nuanced tone. A major UN agency has advised that age-based restrictions pose dangers and "might backfire". The body notes that online platforms can be a "lifeline" for isolated young people and that regulation should not be a "substitute" for platform operators to invest in user protection.

While this global conversation evolves, the actions of Australia and several other countries show that states internationally are increasingly content to stand by for platforms to make changes on their own.