🔗 Share this article

Authorities have called it as among the biggest deceptions of its type in the United Kingdom.

In all 14 individuals have been found guilty for their role in a £28 million scheme to defraud in excess of 3,500 vacation property investors.

The affected individuals were keen to get out of age-old vacation property deals and went looking for support.

A large number were aged between 60 and 80. Over 500 of them surrendered over £10,000, and a single victim paid more than £80,000.

Those targeted were faced aggressive presentations lasting up to six hours. They were financially worse off, possessing valueless fake "credits" and remained trapped in expensive holiday ownership agreements they often use.

The Company At the Heart of the Scam

The business at the centre of the fraud was Sell My Timeshare (SMT). They collected people's money to finance the directors' lavish standard of living of private schools, millionaire mansions and exclusive air travel.

The individual at the head of the company, the company director, was sentenced to a seven and a half year sentence in January for deceptive scheme.

On Friday, his spouse another individual was one of the final three to learn their fate.

She was given a 24-month suspended jail sentence at Southwark Crown Court after admitting money laundering.

This has been a lengthy process and represents a major victory for the people who spoke out, the law enforcement and legal representatives.

How the Investigation Was Initiated

The initial awareness of SMT emerged during the summer of 2016. I was working in the reporting team of a news organization, creating current affairs programmes.

A friend pointed out that his mum had taken over the use of a timeshare apartment in a European resort and, after long-term use, had begun looking to get out of the deal.

It's worth mentioning how popular holiday ownership had grown with UK travelers in the eighties and nineties.

Timeshares enabled people to use the same accommodation each season, or exchange their weeks with fellow investors who had units in other resorts. About 600,000 holiday enthusiasts seized that option.

The initial boom was paired with a many accounts about dishonest operators mis-selling investments. They appeared frequently on consumer broadcasts.

The standard timeshare contract tied investors in for decades.

In that period, those holders who had enjoyed their assigned property in the sun for a long time were getting older, and a large proportion were hoping to wave goodbye to their vacation investments.

A number had declining mobility and found it difficult to access their apartments. Others just believed they'd enjoyed sufficient use from them. And others had passed away, in numerous instances passing on their heirs to take over the agreements - along with their regular contributions and service charges.

The Undercover Operation Develops

This was the situation the relative had ended up. She looked online for solutions and discovered the company, a business whose website promised to terminate her agreement.

Yet, having submitted funds and scheduled a consultation with them, her relatives became suspicious.

Additional investigation revealed hundreds of people claiming they had handed over cash and achieved no result out of it. Indeed, they had suffered financially. Significant sums.

The reporting group began investigating what was happening. It quickly became clear that there were dubious individuals active in the vacation property industry.

A legal professional had numerous client reports waiting to sue the company.

The team interviewed people who had dealt with the organization and they each reported similar experiences. They assumed the business would buy their property away from them but when they attended a meeting (for which they made an advance payment) they were told there was no re-sale value.

In place of that, they were persuaded - in fact compelled - to invest additional funds investing in "the firm's incentive scheme", linked to the organization's holding firm, the overarching entity.

What exactly these were was rather ambiguous. They seemed similar to a type of exchange medium, offering cheaper vacations and services and retail offers.

And they were seemingly "tradable" with fellow investors, at a future date.

Paying cash immediately would lead to an future return that would offset SMT's fees and leave the investor ahead financially, liberated eventually from their troublesome contract.

An unrealistic promise? Well, yes.

A 'Bait-and-Switch Scam'

Assuming these reports were true, this was a massive scam.

The technique is termed a "misleading sales."

Someone - in this case SMT - "baits" the client by marketing a specific service and then claim it is unavailable, directing the client in the direction of a different, lower-quality option.

This is against the law. Armed with all the evidence we had assembled, we presented the rationale to covertly record one of the organization's sessions.

Such an operation demands dedication, work, and clear arguments for why this is the only way to collect the information required to confirm deceptive practices.

Once authorized, our small team organized a meeting with one of the firm's agents in the location.

Pretending to be a potential client wanting to help his mother out of her timeshare contract|holiday ownership agreement